Has Sex in the City Taken the Cosmo with it?

A few weeks ago I read some article in some night life magazine for boston about what's "in" and what's "out". Who gets to decide what in and what's out? Who ever it is shouldn't be allowed to. Or at least they should rotate the opinion makers. Who decided to romantize the life a trucker? Trucker hats? Por-favor! The "magazine" listed Cosmopolitans and anything Burberry as things that were "out". Surprisingly enough, belt with giant personalized buckles that say witty things like "Sex Sitten" and "Hot Babe" are "in". I hated the sight of that plaid print that was plastered on everyhing from umbrellas to backpacks to linnings of expensive coats. FYI: That style has been out in Europe for like the past two years. Apparenly, Burberry also makes a chic carrying case for the iPod that costs like $200. For that you can almost buy yourself an iPod. So back to the Cosmopolitans, according to this magazine their "in-ness" endend with the last episode of Sex in the City. This might be because I haven't seen most of Sex in the City (but enough to know that its super), but I recently discovered them. And I think they're great!

My big question is who trains american bartenders? And what do they teach in bartending school? I think most of it has to do with cheating customers out of their money. Do you know how many $7 martninis it takes to equal 1 5€ vodka con naranja? Two to four. The glasses are so tiny and the drinks so weak. Let's not even start how restaurants and clubs don't even fall in this category because these establishments aren't aware of how much these same drinks cost anywhere else in the city cost.

$6 for a shot? Come on. Where's my vodka con naranja?!